Every single day inventors let me know they "haven't found anything enjoy it." Although which is a nice beginning, it's likely that they haven't been looking in the right places.
Before investing more money and resources, oahu is the proper time to discover definitively in the event the invention is unique, determine if there is a market for it, and explore how to make it better.
Inventors must do searching online having a purpose of finding 2 or 3 competitive products. When they are scared to accomplish the search, that's a positive thing, because in my experience, it usually means they're on the right course.
You will find, the goal should be to find other products in the market that are already attempting to solve the same problem as his or her invention. That implies that a remedy is really needed. And if there exists a need by way of a big enough group, chances are they stand a much better possibility of turning the invention right into a profitable venture.
So inventors moves to some patent agent or patent attorney with samples of 2 or 3 other similar products, after signing a retainer agreement (which establishes the agent/client relationship) the discussion turns for the details of the item including drawings, mockups, and/or prototypes.
At this point, the agent or attorney is going to do a far more thorough search from the U.S. Patent Office as well as other applicable databases in the usa and/or internationally. They are determining if the InventHelp patent invention is indeed unique, or if you can even find more, similar patented products.
Some inventors think about doing the search of the Patent Office by themselves, but there are many problems with this plan. Their emotional attachment towards the invention will cloud their judgment, and they'll avoid finding other goods that are similar. Although chances are they'll have previously identified additional competitors, searching the U.S. Patent Office is a more serious process. From my knowledge about clients that have done their particular search, they have ignored similar items that have already been patented simply because they can't face the reality that their idea is not as unique since they once thought it was.
However, finding additional similar products does not always mean that all is lost. The tactic changes to comparing the proposed invention using the patented one, and discussing ways to improve it to make it patentable. A good patent agent or attorney will provide objective insight only at that phase. The procedure is to take the invention, ignore the parts that have recently been integrated into another patent or patents, and also the remainder is really a patentable invention.